How Karur Vysya Bank evaluates a settlement proposal
Karur Vysya Bank's recovery workflow runs through moderate-high — centralised committee. Committees benchmark every proposal against realisable value under SARFAESI, the age of NPA and KVB's internal sacrifice matrix. Below is the exact stage-by-stage playbook for a Karur Vysya Bank settlement — with who acts, how long each stage takes, and the KVB-specific behaviour at that stage.
End-to-end KVB settlement process
- 1NPA classificationAccount crosses 90-day overdue; system-marked sub-standard.Bank system (auto) · Day 90
- 2Reminder & collectionTelephonic + written reminders; recovery agency assigned for retail.Collections / recovery cell · Day 90–150
- 3Demand notice (13(2))SARFAESI Section 13(2) demand notice issued; 60-day cure period starts.Bank's authorised officer · Day 150–210
- 4OTS proposal filedBorrower files written OTS proposal with financial justification and source-of-funds plan.Borrower / advisor · Any time after NPA
- 5Internal reviewRecovery cell prepares committee note: outstanding, security value, sacrifice, comparable settlements.Recovery officer · 10–25 days
- 6Negotiation rounds2–4 rounds of counter-offers; borrower may be called for committee interaction.Recovery committee · 15–30 days
- 7OTS sanction letterKarur Vysya Bank sanction letter carries a 30–45 day payment window.Sanctioning authority · 3–7 days post-committee
- 8PaymentBorrower pays as per sanction — usually lump sum or 2–3 tranches within validity.Borrower · 60–150 days
- 9NOC & security releaseNo Objection Certificate issued; mortgage / hypothecation released; original documents returned.Bank (release cell) · 15–30 days post-payment
- 10CIBIL update to 'Settled'Bank reports status 'Settled' to all bureaus in the next reporting cycle.Bank credit-reporting · 30–45 days post-NOC
Karur Vysya Bank sanctioning matrix — who approves what
Karur Vysya Bank's approval hierarchy determines both the discount ceiling and the timeline. Filing at the wrong tier is the single biggest reason KVB OTS proposals stall.
| Authority | Exposure limit | Timeline | Decision criteria |
|---|---|---|---|
| Collections / Recovery Agent Team | Up to ₹5 lakh (unsecured) | 3–10 days | Age bucket, prior EMIs, provision status |
| Recovery / Legal Cell — Deputy Head | ₹5 lakh – ₹50 lakh | 10–25 days | Written-off matrix, dispute risk |
| Regional Settlement Committee | ₹50 lakh – ₹5 crore | 20–40 days | Realisable security value, ageing, provision |
| Central Settlement Committee — CFO / CRO chaired | ₹5 crore – ₹25 crore | 30–60 days | Recoverable value vs ARC bid, litigation exposure |
| Board Risk / NPA Committee | Above ₹25 crore | 45–90 days | Enterprise view + investor disclosure risk |
KVB settlement timeline
Common KVB rejection reasons — and how to fix them
KVB product-specific settlement timelines
| Product | Typical settlement | Timeline |
|---|---|---|
| KVB Commercial Loan | 55–72% of principal | 80–150 days |
| KVB MSME Term Loan | 55–72% | 80–150 days |
| CC / WC | 50–68% | 80–150 days |
| KVB Home Loan | 62–75% | 80–145 days |
| KVB Personal Loan | 32–52% | 40–80 days |
| KVB LAP | 55–72% | 80–140 days |
| CC (agri / SME) | 48–68% | 80–150 days |
| KVB Overdraft | 42–62% | 55–115 days |
| KVB Vehicle Loan | 50–70% | 40–85 days |
| KVB Education Loan | 40–58% | 60–120 days |
| KVB Credit Card | 28–48% | 30–55 days |
KVB case studies — anonymised timelines & outcomes
Live examples of the KVB process working end-to-end — same stages as above, mapped to real timelines, discounts and committee outcomes. Client details are anonymised.
- Challenge:
- Textile export slowdown
- Strategy:
- Cluster-specific OTS scheme + fresh valuation
- Outcome:
- Sanctioned at 61% principal
- Challenge:
- 13(4) issued
- Strategy:
- DRT-SA + OTS at 69%
- Outcome:
- Sanctioned; auction withdrawn
- Challenge:
- Feed-price shock
- Strategy:
- OTS under agri-allied MSME window
- Outcome:
- Sanctioned
Client names and identifying details are anonymised. Amounts rounded. Outcomes reflect approved KVB settlements handled by NPA Experts and do not guarantee similar results — every case turns on documentation and committee discretion.
Even a clean process fails when these KVB-specific gaps surface at committee review. Address them before your OTS is tabled.
- Aggressive first offerWhy KVB rejects: Karur Vysya Bank's committee benchmarks against realisable valueHow to fix: Anchor at 55–65% of principal for secured with fresh valuation
- Weak source-of-funds planWhy KVB rejects: Committee discounts unsupported source claimsHow to fix: Attach audit-trail funding — loan sanction, sale MoU or bank statement
- Wilful default flagWhy KVB rejects: RBI Master Direction 2024 needs additional Board approvalHow to fix: Contest classification separately
- Missing hardship narrativeWhy KVB rejects: Committee note requires a 'why'How to fix: 1–2 page written narrative with dated events
- Documentation gapsWhy KVB rejects: Committee cannot decide on incomplete fileHow to fix: Submit complete file at filing
KVB settlement process — city coverage
Deep-dive city hubs for Karur Vysya Bank settlement process. Every link uses the same KVB + city anchor pattern so search engines can map our coverage:
How other lenders handle the same settlement process — sanctioning matrix, discounts and timelines differ:
