How AU Small Finance Bank evaluates a settlement proposal
AU Small Finance Bank's recovery workflow runs through moderate-high — centralised committee. Committees benchmark every proposal against realisable value under SARFAESI, the age of NPA and AU SFB's internal sacrifice matrix. Below is the exact stage-by-stage playbook for a AU Small Finance Bank settlement — with who acts, how long each stage takes, and the AU SFB-specific behaviour at that stage.
End-to-end AU SFB settlement process
- 1NPA classificationAccount crosses 90-day overdue; system-marked sub-standard.Bank system (auto) · Day 90
- 2Reminder & collectionTelephonic + written reminders; recovery agency assigned for retail.Collections / recovery cell · Day 90–150
- 3Demand notice (13(2))SARFAESI Section 13(2) demand notice issued; 60-day cure period starts.Bank's authorised officer · Day 150–210
- 4OTS proposal filedBorrower files written OTS proposal with financial justification and source-of-funds plan.Borrower / advisor · Any time after NPA
- 5Internal reviewRecovery cell prepares committee note: outstanding, security value, sacrifice, comparable settlements.Recovery officer · 10–25 days
- 6Negotiation rounds2–4 rounds of counter-offers; borrower may be called for committee interaction.Recovery committee · 15–30 days
- 7OTS sanction letterAU Small Finance Bank sanction letter carries a 30–45 day payment window.Sanctioning authority · 3–7 days post-committee
- 8PaymentBorrower pays as per sanction — usually lump sum or 2–3 tranches within validity.Borrower · 60–150 days
- 9NOC & security releaseNo Objection Certificate issued; mortgage / hypothecation released; original documents returned.Bank (release cell) · 15–30 days post-payment
- 10CIBIL update to 'Settled'Bank reports status 'Settled' to all bureaus in the next reporting cycle.Bank credit-reporting · 30–45 days post-NOC
AU Small Finance Bank sanctioning matrix — who approves what
AU Small Finance Bank's approval hierarchy determines both the discount ceiling and the timeline. Filing at the wrong tier is the single biggest reason AU SFB OTS proposals stall.
| Authority | Exposure limit | Timeline | Decision criteria |
|---|---|---|---|
| Collections / Recovery Agent Team | Up to ₹5 lakh (unsecured) | 3–10 days | Age bucket, prior EMIs, provision status |
| Recovery / Legal Cell — Deputy Head | ₹5 lakh – ₹50 lakh | 10–25 days | Written-off matrix, dispute risk |
| Regional Settlement Committee | ₹50 lakh – ₹5 crore | 20–40 days | Realisable security value, ageing, provision |
| Central Settlement Committee — CFO / CRO chaired | ₹5 crore – ₹25 crore | 30–60 days | Recoverable value vs ARC bid, litigation exposure |
| Board Risk / NPA Committee | Above ₹25 crore | 45–90 days | Enterprise view + investor disclosure risk |
AU SFB settlement timeline
Common AU SFB rejection reasons — and how to fix them
AU SFB product-specific settlement timelines
| Product | Typical settlement | Timeline |
|---|---|---|
| AU Wheels — Car / CV / Tractor | 50–72% of outstanding | 25–55 days |
| AU Secured Business Loan (SBL) | 55–75% | 75–140 days |
| AU Home Loan | 60–75% | 75–140 days |
| AU Personal Loan | 30–52% | 30–60 days |
| AU Micro / SME Loan | 45–68% | 60–120 days |
| AU Working Capital | 48–68% | 75–140 days |
| AU LAP | 55–72% | 80–140 days |
| CC (SME) | 48–68% | 75–140 days |
| AU Overdraft | 42–62% | 45–85 days |
| AU Education Loan | 38–58% | 60–120 days |
| AU Credit Card | 28–48% | 30–55 days |
AU SFB case studies — anonymised timelines & outcomes
Live examples of the AU SFB process working end-to-end — same stages as above, mapped to real timelines, discounts and committee outcomes. Client details are anonymised.
- Challenge:
- Vehicle repossessed, auction in 20 days
- Strategy:
- Pre-auction OTS at 60% + fresh valuation
- Outcome:
- Sanctioned; vehicle released
- Challenge:
- 13(2) issued, cashflow collapse
- Strategy:
- Regional SARB OTS at 63% principal
- Outcome:
- Sanctioned
- Challenge:
- SMA-2, business income loss
- Strategy:
- OTS at 69% principal
- Outcome:
- Sanctioned pre-13(4)
Client names and identifying details are anonymised. Amounts rounded. Outcomes reflect approved AU SFB settlements handled by NPA Experts and do not guarantee similar results — every case turns on documentation and committee discretion.
Even a clean process fails when these AU SFB-specific gaps surface at committee review. Address them before your OTS is tabled.
- Aggressive first offerWhy AU SFB rejects: AU Small Finance Bank's committee benchmarks against realisable valueHow to fix: Anchor at 55–65% of principal for secured with fresh valuation
- Weak source-of-funds planWhy AU SFB rejects: Committee discounts unsupported source claimsHow to fix: Attach audit-trail funding — loan sanction, sale MoU or bank statement
- Wilful default flagWhy AU SFB rejects: RBI Master Direction 2024 needs additional Board approvalHow to fix: Contest classification separately
- Missing hardship narrativeWhy AU SFB rejects: Committee note requires a 'why'How to fix: 1–2 page written narrative with dated events
- Documentation gapsWhy AU SFB rejects: Committee cannot decide on incomplete fileHow to fix: Submit complete file at filing
AU SFB settlement process — city coverage
Deep-dive city hubs for AU Small Finance Bank settlement process. Every link uses the same AU SFB + city anchor pattern so search engines can map our coverage:
How other lenders handle the same settlement process — sanctioning matrix, discounts and timelines differ:
